Monday, January 26, 2015

Christians’ Love of the Warfare State Is Killing Other Christians


Christians’ Love of the Warfare State Is Killing Other Christians

When Will Evangelical Christians Start To See Through This Charade?

Chuck Baldwin
Ever since the George W. Bush administration, evangelical pastors and churches have been America’s loudest cheerleaders for virtually every act of war the U.S. has waged against foreign countries. For pastors such as John Hagee, wars of aggression in the Middle East are predicated upon the notion of protecting Israel--even though military meddling by the United States has only served to make life more dangerous for Israel. But leaving Israel out of the equation, evangelicals are the first to trumpet U.S. wars of aggression. I would even suggest that the favorite hymn of most evangelical churches these days is no longer John Newton’s “Amazing Grace,” but John McCain’s “Bomb, Bomb, Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Iran.”
I would go even further to say that evangelical churches have become the very best friend that the military/industrial complex has ever had. It is congressmen and senators from districts and states heavily-laden with evangelical churches that continue to pump unlimited tax-dollars into the Warfare State. One could even make the argument that in most evangelical churches, Jesus’ adage “Blessed are the peacemakers” has been changed to “Blessed are the warmongers.”
Let’s set the record straight: perpetual war is a tool of elitists and globalists to enslave the U.S. citizenry. While we are killing thousands of people abroad (most of whom are innocents)--all in the name of “liberating” them--we are tightening the tyrannical noose around the necks of the American people. In the name of the “War on Terror,” the most sophisticated surveillance society in the history of mankind has been created right here in the continental United States. With the advent of the Patriot Act and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) under G.W. Bush, Washington, D.C., has constructed (and is continuing to construct) a burgeoning police state the likes of which Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse-tung, and Adolf Hitler could have only dreamed about. And for the most part, evangelicals are fine with it.
But what is really happening in those countries that these endless wars are supposedly “liberating?” And specifically, what is happening to the thousands and millions of Christians within those countries after having been “liberated” by Uncle Sam? After all, America’s evangelical churches of every denomination spend millions of dollars every year sending missionaries around the globe to evangelize folks. How many missionary slides have we seen? How many passionate, tearful sermons have we heard imploring us to get a burden for missions? One of the most sacred elements of any Christian church is its missions program.
So, on the one hand, evangelicals are weeping, praying, and giving millions of dollars to make Christians out of the peoples of the world and on the other hand, they are leading the charge for America’s efforts to rain death and destruction down upon those same people.
Aside from the utter inconsistency of the above, what are all of these endless wars accomplishing for the Christians who live inside the countries that we are “liberating?” What is all of these Christian-endorsed wars doing to the people of God around the world? The answer will shock most believers.
According to an Infowars.com report, “In areas where we spent hundreds of billions of dollars and where thousands of precious American lives were sacrificed, churches are regularly being bombed, Christians are being brutally beheaded, and laws have been passed to make it illegal for a Muslim to convert to Christianity.  If we were not even able to provide the most basic of liberties and freedoms to the people living in those nations, what in the world did we actually accomplish by ‘liberating’ them?
“Just look at what has happened in Afghanistan.  We have been at war in Afghanistan for more than a dozen years, and yet things are so bad for Christians in that country at this point that there is not a single church left . . .”
The report goes on to say, “We find a similar story in Iraq. It is estimated that before the invasion, there were up to 2 million Christians living in Iraq. Now that number is down to less than 450,000, and it is falling fast.
“In fact, things are so dire for Iraq’s Christian community that some Iraqi Christian leaders are warning that Christians may soon become ‘extinct’ in that nation…”
The report continues, “In Syria, the Obama administration is shamelessly allying with radical al-Qaeda jihadists in a desperate attempt to overthrow the Assad regime.
“As these jihadists torture, behead and even crucify Christian believers, the mainstream media in the United States is virtually silent about it.
“Why is the media being so quiet?
“Well, because exposing what is going on would make the Obama administration look bad.
Those carrying out this persecution of Christians in Syria are being directly funded and aided by the governments of the United States and Saudi Arabia.”
See the report at:
The same could be said for Christians in the country of Libya.
But remember that these wars of aggression began in earnest under the “Christian” George W. Bush administration and have been ongoing throughout the Barack Obama administration. In fact, Obama’s continuation of the Bush preemptive war policy is the one thing about the Obama administration that most evangelical Christians actually support.
And please understand that what has happened to Christians in Middle Eastern countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria has happened in every other country that U.S. government has chosen to pressure--either by military intervention or economic sanction--including Nigeria and The Sudan.
A report in National Review Online states, “Prominent indicators confirm that the U.S. is the chief facilitator of the persecution of Christians around the world today.
“According to the recently released 2014 World Watch List, which ranks the 50 nations where Christians are most persecuted, Syria is the third worst nation in the world in which to be Christian, Iraq is fourth, Afghanistan fifth, and Libya 13th. All four countries receive the strongest designation, ‘extreme persecution’ (other designations are ‘severe,’ ‘moderate,’ and ‘sparse’ persecution). 
“Aside from being so closely and harshly ranked, these four nations have something else in common: heavy U.S. involvement. Three--Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya--were ‘liberated’ thanks to U.S. forces, while in the fourth, Syria, the U.S. is actively sponsoring ‘freedom fighters’ against the regime, many of whom would be better labeled ‘terrorists.’”
The author of this report, Raymond Ibrahim, concludes by saying, “I am often asked, ‘How can we help persecuted Christians?’ At this point, one must respond: ‘How about starting with getting the U.S. government to stop being the chief facilitator of Christian persecution?’ Altruism aside, it would be in the interests of all freedom-loving people--and especially their descendants.”
See the report at:
I wonder what the vast majority of evangelical Christians would think if they realized that their support for all of these preemptive wars around the world--especially in the Middle East--are actually the major cause of much of the persecutions against their fellow brothers and sisters in Christ. I shudder to think what America’s Christians will say to their fellow-believers in Heaven who were savagely martyred due to the wars of aggression that they, America’s Christians, so enthusiastically supported.
America’s Warfare State, complete with the military/industrial complex, is facilitating the most egregious persecution of Christians since the days of Stalin, Hitler, and Chairman Mao and is turning the land of the free into a giant police state. When will the American people start to see through this charade? When will America’s pastors and Christians start to see through this charade?
If America’s evangelical pastors and churches would end their constant support for all of these foreign wars, if they would recognize the danger--globally and domestically--that the military/industrial complex poses, and if they would start putting the interests of this country above their parochial preoccupations with favored foreign states and personal eschatological opinions and interpretations, the Warfare State would collapse.
The Church has always been the compass of the country; and right now, the compass is broken, and the ship of state is way off course.
Recommended Reading:

Thursday, January 22, 2015

Presbyterian Church and Palestinian Liberal Christians Rewriting the Bible to Remove References to Israel


Presbyterian Church and Palestinian Liberal Christians Rewriting the Bible to Remove References to Israel

By Julio Severo
Sabeel (Palestinian Ecumenical Liberation Theology Center) has partnered with the Presbyterian Church (USA) to produce a new Bible version that changes God’s Word.
U.S. Presbyterian delegations celebrating 25 years of the Palestinian Liberation Theology at Sabeel
The new version has no mention of Israel as Jewish and no mention of Jesus as a Jew. In fact, Jesus (Yeshua) is changed from being Jewish to being a Palestinian Arab, according to Geri Ungurean in NowTheEndBegins.
Sabeel (Arabic ‘the way’ and also ‘a channel’ or ‘spring’) is a Christian liberation theology organization based in Jerusalem. It was founded by Palestinian Anglican priest Rev. Naim Ateek, the former Canon of St. George’s Cathedral in Jerusalem.
According to Ungurean, Dr. Ateek “wants to rewrite the Bible in the same manner that Catholic, Anglican and Reformed theologies have claimed that the Christian Church is ‘The New Israel,’ also called ‘The Israel of God.’ Rewriting history and inventing theology is a popular vocation. Revisionist historians take liberties with facts until they cease to have meaning. Prime examples are the Holocaust denial polemics or current trends to rewrite American history texts.”
Ungurean says, “An official partner of the Presbyterian Church USA, Sabeel has Friends of Sabeel chapters in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Ireland, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Australia.”
Sabeel is involved with the “Christ at the CheckPoint” conference, which seeks to undermine the traditional evangelical support for Israel.
Why would the Presbyterian Church in the United States (PCUSA), which is the largest Presbyterian denomination in the U.S., get involved with Sabeel and its Liberation Theology?
Liberation Theology is the most widespread theological liberalism in our days. And PCUSA is an evidence of its evils. Having firstly embraced the Social Gospel in the late 19th century, Presbyterians later formed PCUSA, which is now a full-blown liberal power-house, supporting homosexual “marriage,” abortion and anti-Israel stances.
Liberation Theology may be the Social Gospel’s most important offshoot.
A Presbyterian missionary from the Social Gospel movement came to Brazil in 1952 and spent one decade teaching theology in the most prominent Presbyterian theological institution in Brazil. His name was Rev. Richard Shaull, and he was involved in several Marxist and communist causes in Brazil. The birth of the Theology of Integral Mission (TIM) in Brazil is traced and credited to him.
Even though TIM is labeled as the Protestant version of Liberation Theology, TIM was born before Liberation Theology. For more information, download my free e-book here: http://bit.ly/15AJmMC
TIM is destroying the Evangelical Church in Brazil. And Liberation Theology is destroying the Catholic Church in Brazil.
Probably, TIM contributed for the birth of Liberation Theology in the 1960s. So you see how powerful the Social Gospel was!
PCUSA is representative of the future of churches under the Liberation Theology and TIM spell: supporters of abortion, gay “marriage” and anti-Israel.
At the end, what does difference make if they change the Bible or not? They do not care about what God commands and teaches about Israel, the Church, the Kingdom of God, the value of unborn human life, the natural marriage and family.
Recommended Reading:

Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Beware of the Revolution Man: Socialist Billionaire George Soros Spent $33 Million to Turn Ferguson Protest into National Revolution


Beware of the Revolution Man: Socialist Billionaire George Soros Spent $33 Million to Turn Ferguson Protest into National Revolution

By Julio Severo
Ferguson protests were much more than about injustice, race or a black teen killed by police.
Does it make some sense a white teen killed by a black cop receiving no significant media attention while a black teen killed by a white cop receives massive media attention?
When a suspicious case does not make sense, follow the money.
According to the Washington Times, socialist billionaire George Soros donated $33million to left-wing organizations that helped turn events in Ferguson from a local protest into a national and international firestorm.
A high number of activists travelled from many cities across the United States to pour into Ferguson to turn a local protest into a national revolution.
Buses of activists from groups including the Drug Policy Alliance, Make the Road New York, and the Center for Community Change in Washington — all funded in part by Soros — went to Ferguson beginning in August and went on to organize gatherings and protests there until late December, according to the Washington Times.
One of the organizations that Soros funds, and which fueled the demonstrations in Ferguson, is the Gamaliel Foundation, a network of grass-roots, interreligious groups. President Barack Obama started his community-organizing career at a Gamaliel affiliate in Chicago.
The Gamaliel affiliate in St. Louis — Metropolitan Congregations United — organized the “Weekend of Resistance” in October, in which clergy members from around the nation were called to come to Ferguson to protest.
Representatives of Sojourners, a national socialist evangelical organization headed by Jim Wallis, attended the weekend. The group received $150,000 from Soros in 2011.
Clergy representatives from the Samuel Dewitt Proctor Conference (SDPC), where the Rev. Jeremiah Wright is a trustee, also participated in the protests. Wright was Obama’s long-time pastor in Chicago. SDPC received $250,000 from Soros in 2011.
How is Soros able to grant massive funds to socialist groups?
The billionaire’s fortune was made from speculating on financial markets, most notably making more than $1billion in the 1990s helping cripple the British financial system.
Soros is a well-known supporter of progressive-liberal causes and is a political donor to Obama’s campaigns. He committed $1 million to Obama in 2012.
He has built a business empire that dominates across the ocean in Europe while forging a political machine powered by nonprofit foundations that impacts American and international politics and policy.
How has he influenced in the international scenario?
Has Soros also used the “Ferguson coup” in other places? Whenever you see a revolution, follow the money, and do not be scared or surprised if Soros is involved behind the scenes.
If you think that the $33 million Soros spent to inflame the Ferguson protest is much, consider the “mysterious” revolution in Ukraine. “Soros has provided more than $100 million to support Ukrainian groups,” according to WorldNetDaily, which also said that “Soros heavily invested in Ukraine crisis.”
Both in the Ferguson crisis and the Ukrainian crisis, the U.S. government under Obama has sided with Soros and his plots.
Christians also have been targeted by Soros’ plots. In 2012, the Center for Constitutional Rights, a Soros-funded Marxist group, filed a lawsuit against Rev. Scott Lively for “crime against humanity.” His crime? He expressed the traditional Christian view on the homosexual perversions in the Ugandan Parliament.
If Soros is able to turn a protest into a national revolution, what does it hinder one of his groups from turning a Christian minister into a “criminal against humanity”? His specialty is to inflame.
Sadly, Soros has more plans against Christians. According to the ChristianPost, he has been funding movements to weaken the tradition evangelical support for Israel.
Soros is a Jew. How can a Jew undermine pro-Israel evangelical churches?
In fact, how can a capitalist billionaire Jew fund so many socialist revolutions, protests and crisis around the world, from Ferguson to Ukraine?
If there are betrayers among Christians (and most of them are socialist), why would not there be equally socialist, betraying Jews?
Next time you see a suspicious protest turning into a socialist revolution, follow the money. In the end of the dark rainbow, there is a greedy socialist capitalist and his plots.
With information from the Washington Times, Daily Mail and NewsMax.
Recommended Reading:

Sunday, January 18, 2015

Malarkey Did Not Go to Heaven: The Foolishness of Believing that All is False or True


Malarkey Did Not Go to Heaven: The Foolishness of Believing that All is False or True

NYT Best-Selling Author Lied About Going to Heaven

By Julio Severo
If you believe that a bad name can bring a curse, consider Alex Malarkey, who says now he did not die and go to heaven.
He is co-author of Tyndale House Publishers’ “The Boy Who Came Back From Heaven,” published in 2010. Now he says that his book is deceptive and he is blaming Christian retailers for selling it. Because he is recanting the story of his visit to heaven, mega news outlets — from Time magazine to DailyMail — are covering his case.
This seems their golden chance to say, “Hey, there is no Heaven!”
I do not know the reason for Malarkey to go “malarkey,” an English word that means “Exaggerated or foolish talk, usually intended to deceive.” But the same world that loves exaggerated lies is attacking Malarkey’s malarkey.
There is today a trend of homosexual malarkeys, but the same mega-media that have condemned “The Boy Who Came Back From Heaven” just love to believe that a man is a woman and vice-versa. They have intensely worked to convince us that the bogus woman who was born a man is a woman. And they have worked to change minds and laws in favor of this lie.
Homosexual malarkeys are the favorite lies today.
About “The Boy Who Came Back From Heaven,” just because you found a false testimony it does not follow that all testimonies about Heaven are false. Different is the homosexual case. You know that all men that say that they are female are liars because their DNA is male. Nothing can change it. Through DNA, science proves that a man is a man and a woman is a woman. No one can lie against his own DNA.
The author of “The Boy Who Came Back From Heaven” lied to God, but his lie does not disqualify other testimonies about heaven.
Two days ago I read a Facebook comment by an Assemblies of God Brazilian-American leader using “The Boy Who Came Back From Heaven” to condemn all similar spiritual experiences. At the same time, he has used his Facebook to promote and support comments and views by a Presbyterian minister who espouses socialism and Freemasonry. In fact, this minister is a Freemason himself.
In the past (70 years ago?) it would be perfectly normal to see a liberal Masonic Presbyterian minister using a false testimony to condemn all spiritual testimonies — and, by the way, to condemn also Assemblies of God ministers.
Times have changed. Now Assemblies of God ministers play the old role of the Masonic Presbyterian minister.
It is very unfortunate that Malarkey went malarkey, but God’s Word has never changed.
“Do not quench the Spirit. Do not despise prophecies, but test everything; hold fast what is good. Abstain from every form of evil.” (1 Thessalonians 5:19-22 ESV)
The big socialist media that love and spread all homosexual malarkeys is using Malarkey’s malarkey to disqualify all Christian testimonies about the Heaven.
Christians should not be an accessory to their malarkeys.
We should reject malarkeys in our midst without rejecting true testimonies. And we should reject and denounce all homosexual malarkeys promoted by the big socialist media.
As to Alex Malarkey, he should change his surname — Truthtelling, for the sake of a good Christian testimony.
The world forgives all homosexual lies, but it never forgives a “Christian” lie.
I know that all testimonies — loved and promoted by the big socialist media — that a man is a woman are bogus.
Yet, I have no presumptuous right to say that all testimonies about Heaven are false or true. The big socialist media would want you to believe that all of them are bogus.
If the media were correct, Apostle Paul, who went to Heaven, would have been a liar. The problem is: the media love lies.
They accept the lying testimonies from the darkness and reject the testimonies from Christians. For them, there are no malarkeys about homosexuality. For them, some malarkeys among Christians are an evidence that all Christian testimonies are bogus.
All homosexual malarkeys receive heavenly treatment from the big socialist media. Regardless their true or false nature, Christian testimonies are labeled malarkey and receive hellish treatment.
The big socialist media are throwing a big party against Christian testimonies and Heaven because of Malarkey while they keep their usual celebrations of homosexual malarkeys.
Recommended Reading:

Saturday, January 17, 2015

Gay Magazine Praises Jeb Bush


Gay Magazine Praises Jeb Bush

By Julio Severo
Jeb Bush, the hope for American conservatives in the next U.S. presidential elections, is flirting with the gay agenda.
Jeb Bush
In an illuminating article entitled “Why the Gay Agenda Is Praising Jeb Bush,” Peter LaBarbera says, “It is becoming apparent that Jeb Bush is the favorite Republican Party presidential contender of the Washington Blade-D.C.’s ‘gay news source’ — due to his politically-correct evolution on homosexuality and same-sex ‘marriage.’ The Blade and other liberal media report favorably every time the former Florida governor moves away from the conservative, pro-family, Republican platform defending marriage as between man and woman.”
These do not have been good times for conservatives. Last year, LaBarbera was detained by the “conservative” government of Canada. More recently, conservative George W. Bush has described socialist Bill Clinton as a “brother from another mother.” Now, his biological brother has been praised by a homosexual magazine.
What is happening to political conservative figures these days? Homosexual publications are expected to praise socialist figures, not “conservative” ones. Yet, in 2013, Pope Francis was named “Person of the Year” by world’s biggest gay magazine. Is the conservative world turning pro-sodomy?
Why would a homosexual magazine praise Jeb Bush? According to LaBarbera, gay activists loved the “softer tone” of his reaction when they “overthrew of Florida’s pro-natural-marriage amendment, which had passed with 62 percent of the vote in 2008.” Here is Jeb’s speech:
 “We live in a democracy, and regardless of our disagreements, we have to respect the rule of law… I hope that we can show respect for the good people on all sides of the gay and lesbian marriage issue—including couples making lifetime commitments to each other who are seeking greater legal protections and those of us who believe marriage is a sacrament and want to safeguard religious liberty.”
LaBarbera says a few hundred thousand Republican voters cast ballots to preserve the common-sense definition marriage, and Bush says its striking down is a “rule of law.”
Rule of homosexual law? Traditionally, socialists — especially from the Democratic Party — have supported such a “rule.” Now are even Republican politicians chosen by conservatives flirting with the gay agenda?
LaBarbera finished by saying,
“It appears Jeb Bush is not up to the task, but he is not alone among a bevy of GOP governors, politicians and libertarian-minded pundits who have chosen pandering over principle on this critical issue that speaks to the character of a nation—a nation that claims to be ‘under God’ while defying His moral law and created natural order.”
These incompatibilities and inconsistencies scare away conservative Christians from Republican demagogues and betrayers.
Good conservatives have left the GOP, because the GOP has left them and conservative values.
Matt Barber, owner of the magnificent BarbWire, has left the GOP.
Conservative champion Scott Lively run for governor of Massachusetts as an independent candidate in the last election. By the way, the first U.S. state to legalize homosexual “marriage” was Massachusetts under Republican Governor Mitt Romney, elected by conservatives, fully betrayed by their political choice.
Fortunately, Romney the Betrayer lost the last presidential election.
How many betrayals will be enough for conservative Christians to wake from the deception by politicians who cheat them?
We need an army of Barbers and Livelys — men with solid and uncompromising conservative convictions.
Portuguese version of this article: Revista gay louva Jeb Bush
Recommended Reading:

Monday, January 12, 2015

Siding with the “religion of peace”: Obama, Bush, Brzezinski…


Siding with the “religion of peace”: Obama, Bush, Brzezinski…

By Julio Severo
Barack Obama, in his biography “The Audacity of Hope,” says about Muslims, “I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”
So if the Western world begins to reject the U.S. presidential propaganda portraying Islam as a “religion of peace” and begins to treat this religion as a cowardly ideology slaughtering innocents, Obama commits himself to side with the oppressors.
Remember: by far Islam is the ideology most martyrizing Christians around the world each year.
It would be so good if the U.S. had a president who said, “I will stand with Christians now that the U.S. and Western fad is to flatter Islam.”
Of course, if some other nation dares to side with Christians and goes against the Islamic ideology, it will face Obama and U.S. sanctions.
There is no hope in the two major U.S. parties. The U.S. president who began the deceptive propaganda of Islam a “religion of peace” was not Obama. It was Bush. The U.S. policy, in the two parties, shamelessly licks Islamic boots.
So did everything begin with Bush? No. Everything began decades ago, more strongly during the Jimmy Carter administration, who was a liberal precursor of Obama. For Brazil, Carter is remembered as the man who protected Leonel Brizola and other communists from the military. It was also under Carter that the U.S. government began to collect papers against the military rule in Brazil. Some of these papers were delivered to the Brazilian administration of socialist Dilma Rousseff months ago to help the infamous ‘Truth’ National Committee.
Another significant fact is that Carter had a strategic adviser who helped the U.S. in geopolitical and military issues. His name is Zbigniew Brzezinski. His strategy was to use Islamic terrorism against the Soviet Union.
As far as the moral aspect is concerned, Islamic terrorism is wicked and so was the Soviet Union. Both deserved to be annihilated. Brzezinski’s strategy was to use one to annihilate the other.
Check here the video where Brzezinski flatters Islamic terrorists: http://youtu.be/pErfG5ki8D8

So Brzezinski helped in the birth and funding of al-Qaida, which was created to be a terror for the Soviet Union, but it got completely out of control and eventually became a terror to the whole world. Brzezinski’s old ally, Osama bin Laden, later used all his experience as a former CIA agent to torment the world with his al-Qaida. It is a perfect example of schemes backfiring. Not much different of ISIS, which, according to WND, also was born with U.S. assistance.
Deservedly, the Soviet Union fell, but Brzezinski’s strategic policies (anti-Russia, U.S.-Islamic alliance) keep guiding the U.S.
In his 1997 book “The Grand Chessboard,” Brzezinski contends that the U.S. have a worldwide hegemony in the main domains. He says,
“America stands supreme in the four decisive domains of global power: militarily… economically… technologically… and culturally.”
The only area, according to Brzezinski, that is not under total U.S. control is the Eurasian region, an area of interest for the U.S. (which has no border there), for Turkey (which occupies a small part of it) and for Russia (which occupies a major part of that region).
About Russia’s Islamic neighbors, Brzezinski foresees “something worse” than “the painful precedents of Chechnya” may happen. “The Grand Chessboard” says, “For the Russians, the specter of a potential conflict with the Islamic states along Russia's entire southern flank (which, adding in Turkey, Iran, and Pakistan, account for more than 300 million people) has to be a source of serious concern.” Of course, as evidenced by Brzezinski’s anti-Russian pro-Islam history, if Islam is a big threat to Russia, nothing more strategic than the U.S. helping in the fulfillment of Brzezinski’s “foresight” by expanding the radical Islamic influence in those regions.
His book talks sparingly about worries over communist threat, but it address abundantly Russia as an enemy to be conquered. Brzezinski’s main worry is to extend U.S. hegemony to Eurasia.
Partially, because of those hegemonic ambitions the U.S. keeps its alliance and flattery to Islam.
Guided by nationalism and ignoring ideological differences, the two major parties follow their tradition of supporting Islam. So the U.S. helped to create al-Qaida. The Soviet Union ended, but both parties have had a hard time to quit old habits.
With them, the U.S. has been faithful to its Islamic allies, especially Saudi Arabia, which is the main funder of the international Islamic terrorism. Not to mention Turkey, which has become a major threat by striving after an Islamic expansion in Latin America. Turkey is the only Muslim nation in the NATO, the U.S. military alliance.
For the sake of the anti-Russian pro-Islam strategy, all is allowed, including appointing Muslims to high-rank positions. Two years ago, Obama appointed a Muslim as CIA director. Even in the Department of Homeland Security, radical Muslims hold significant posts.
By following this strategy, the U.S.’s supreme message today is, “Islam is a religion of peace.” This deception has been embraced around the world, because the nation promoting this propaganda has, according to Brzezinski, the cultural and technological hegemony and supremacy.
The Soviet Union ended, but Brzezinski’s anti-Russia pro-Islam strategy remains. He and his followers will not be satisfied while the U.S. does not extend its supremacy to Eurasia, whatever it takes. And the cost of that hegemonic ambition will come through Islam.
Mohammed’s ‘pacifists’ can kill millions of innocents and the only message you are going to hear from the U.S. mass media is: Islam is a “religion of peace.”
Who is paying the cost of this deception? Abundant reports published by American specialists point that U.S. military interventions have been benefitting Islamic persecution of Christians. About 150 millions Christians are persecuted by Islam.
Approximately 100,000 Christians are martyrized each years. The big martyrizer is Islam. Even so, just because the U.S. has anti-Russia ambitions and wants to extend its hegemony to Eurasia, you have to swallow down the deceptive propaganda that Islam is a “religion of peace.”
Deception helps to kill, especially when it comes from a nation founded by persecuted evangelicals to help persecuted Christians. To help Islam in the worldwide persecution of Christians is a total departure from the original mission that the evangelical Founders had given to America.
Recommended Reading:

Friday, January 09, 2015

The Vatican and four Muslim leaders jointly condemned attack in Paris as European elites fear conservative wave


The Vatican and four Muslim leaders jointly condemned attack in Paris as European elites fear conservative wave

By Julio Severo
Four French Muslim leaders and the Vatican issued a joint declaration Thursday denouncing the Paris newspaper massacre.
The declaration stressed that dialogue among religions was the only way to eliminate prejudice.
According to the Associated Press, the Vatican has sought to mend relations with Islam that were initially strained under Pope Benedict XVI, who in 2006 made a speech that suggested Islam espouses violence. His suggestion caused storms of protest throughout the Islamic world.
Even though Benedict said he had been misunderstood and apologized, Muslims never again forgot his suggestion.
Of course, the “attack” in Paris, usually mentioned without any “Muslim” or “Islamic” adjectives, just proves that Benedict’s “suggestion” was sheer reality.
Yet, European socialist elites are not worried about Islam and its violent nature. They are, according to the Associated Press, worried that “Populist movements warning of the Islamization of Europe have been gaining ground across the continent, in small countries like Denmark and large ones like Britain, Germany and France.”
These elites denounce “the arguments of rightwing forces declaring Islam to be incompatible with Western values.”
Some of the strongest responses to the Islamic terror in Paris came from Germany, and the Associated Press promptly reminded its international readers that the Nazi movement was born in Germany, insinuating that opposition to Islamization equals “racism” and “Nazism.”
German chancellor Angela Merkel has condemned PEGIDA, an anti-Islamization movement, declaring, “There is no place in Germany for those who are instigating hatred against immigrants.” She also denounced the protesters for “racism.”
The AP report also mentioned PEGIDA, and again, promptly reminded its readers that anti-Islamization protests “have alarmed politicians in Germany 70 years after the Holocaust.” The AP insinuation: European, especially German, feelings against Islamization are the seeds for a Holocaust against Muslim. Hey, the first Holocaust was against the Jews, and Muslim were allies of the Nazis. How can AP, an American media, associate Islamic radicals with Jew victims? How can AP use the Holocaust against Jews to defend Muslims?
Actually, Muslims, who 70 years ago helped Hitler in the first Holocaust against the Jews, today have been committing a yearly Holocaust of Christian martyrs. Besides, a larger Muslim population in Europe is provoking a larger persecution of Jews throughout Europe.
Immediately after talking about the Holocaust, AP mentions Geert Wilders, the leader of the anti-Islam Freedom Party.
So for Merkel and AP and the general Western media, if you oppose Islamization in Europe, you are a racist, a Nazi and support the Holocaust!
In the PS (Politically Socialist) Europe, there is no place for those opposed to Islamization. But there is plenty of places for Islamists.
In the PS Europe, there is no place and tolerance for conservative values, especially Jewish-Christian values, in the government and society. But there is plenty of places and tolerance for Islamic values, including Sharia, which are expanding throughout Europe.
Rabid multiculturalism has delivered the European destiny into the hand of her Islamic executioners.
With information from the Associated Press.
Recommended Reading: