Thursday, November 29, 2012

Man who thought he was a tiger has killed himself


Man who thought he was a tiger has killed himself

By Julio Severo
Dennis Avner, a 54 years old man who spent years trying hard to make his body look like a tiger, has committed suicide. According to DailyMail of November 13, his body was found November 5. He lived alone.
Dennis Avner
The problem of Avner began when a Native chief, guided by spirits, said that Avner should “follow the ways of the tiger.”
With an impressionable mind, Avner didn’t to grudge any pains to transform his fantasy into reality, making his own body to look like what his imagination thought he was: a tiger. Regardless what he saw or what others saw, the important thing was what the eyes of his mind saw.
With his desire governing his head, he went through surgical procedures in his mouth, lips and ears. He also started to use silicones and implants. After all, to live in the fantasy world is today a kind of fundamental “human right”, even when such a fantasy is pathological. Avner lived that right to its last consequences, until his own suicide.
The case of Dennis Avner is not different from radical homosexuals, who want to live according to their sexual desires or fantasies. It does not matter what their eyes see or what the eyes of others see, they will use any trick — silicones, mutilations, hormones, etc. — to deny, hide and reject what the nature has powerfully engraved in their bodies.
Anus is the exclusive orifice for defecation, never for sex. Nature proves abundantly it.
If it is ridiculous for a man to see himself as a tiger, it is more ridiculous to treat anus as a sexual organ.
The only difference between Avner and radical homosexuals is that, at least for the time being, there is no large number of people thinking they are tigers, monkeys, donkeys and pigs, although many have behaved this way.
If their number increases, then we will certainly see parades of donkeys and pigs, and lobbies in the Congress: “To walk on hands and knees is a human right!”
We will see mutant men and women, with their deformed, siliconized and operated bodies, putting their crazy imagination above Nature.
Obviously, Avner was not happy. Men only kill themselves because they are extremely unhappy.
It is obvious also that, to see himself as a tiger or a pig, a man has mental problems.
But if Avner saw himself as a “woman”, then the media chorus would begin, “He killed himself because of ‘homophobia’ preached by bigoted fundamentalist Christian haters, not because of mental problems!”
However, the difference between the fantasy of Avner and a man’s fantasy that wants to be a woman is very little, so that activists could say, “He killed himself not because of mental problems, but because a bigoted society hates the appearance of an animal in a human!”
The great contradiction in the modern tendency of men and women artificially altering the natural form and functions of their bodies in the name of assumed individual and human rights is that the society sends, at the same time, the message that Nature is sacred and that humans should live in harmony with her norms.
A society that approves and consecrates in its laws the mutilation and disfigurement of the human physical nature transforms men and women into aberrations for themselves and Nature.
The fact is, when looking themselves at the mirror, mutilated men and women will never be satisfied with the result of their surgical and hormonal procedures to be what they are not, because they know that their imagination can alter at the most their appearances, but never the reality impressed by Nature. The end result is despair, madness and death.
When will this stop? It is difficult to know, because human imagination has no limits.
Portuguese version of this article: Suicidou-se homem que pensava que era um tigre
Other article by Julio Severo:

Monday, November 26, 2012

Palestinian Gays Want World Boycotts against Israel


Palestinian Gays Want World Boycotts against Israel

By Julio Severo
Gay activists will be in the forefront of the World Social Forum: Free Palestine, an international event to be held in Porto Alegre, Brazil from November 28 to December 1, 2012, which will bring together Marxist activists from around the world to demand a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital and boycotts against Israel.
Palestinian Queers for Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions, Pinkwatching Israel wants to mobilize Brazilian and international activists and social movements around queer visions, boycott, divestment, sanctions, and pinkwatching against Israel.
Marxists and gay activists are not strange bedfellows in the West. But gays in the forefront of the anti-Israel event in Brazil are not Westerners. They are Palestinians.
Even though homosexuals are not tolerated in Muslim nations, Palestinians have found that homosexuals are not totally useless, at least not for their strategic public relations in the West. If Westerners like things in a homosexual way, Muslims will grant their wishes.
Yet, the use of homosexuals for public relations against Israel has nothing to do with their treatment in their own Muslim nations.
One young man discovered to be gay was forced by Palestinian Authority police “to stand in sewage water up to his neck, his head covered by a sack filled with feces, and then he was thrown into a dark cell infested with insects.” During one interrogation Palestinian police stripped him and forced him to sit on a Coke bottle.
When he was released he fled to Israel. If he were forced to return to Gaza, he said, “The police would kill me.”
An American who foolishly moved into the West Bank to live with his Palestinian lover said they told everyone they were just friends, but one day they “found a letter under our door from the Islamic court. It listed the five forms of death prescribed by Islam for homosexuality, including stoning and burning. We fled to Israel that same day,” he said.
According to a gay group, “The persecution of gays in the Palestinian Authority doesn’t just come from the families or the Islamic groups, but from the P.A. itself.”
One gay man went to Israel for a short time. When he returned to the West Bank, Palestinian Authority police confined him to a pit without food and water until he died.
The majority of Muslims in the East consider harsh treatment of homosexuals to be perfectly justified.
Textbooks for Islamic Studies, officially used by the Saudi Ministry of Education, say:
“Homosexuality is one of the most disgusting sins and greatest crimes.... It is a vile perversion that goes against sound nature, and is one of the most corrupting and hideous sins.... The punishment for homosexuality is death… [the perpetrator] is to be burned with fire. It has also been said that he should be stoned, or thrown from a high place.”
Ten Muslim nations officially impose the death penalty for homosexuals. They are Iran, Mauritania, Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi-Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, United Arab Emirates, Yemen and some states in Malaysia.
Other Muslim countries have no official death penalty for homosexuals, but homosexuals are murdered anyway by police and the population.
Regardless the harsh reality for homosexuals in Muslim nations, including among Palestinians, Brazil and the West will gladly welcome Palestinian gays at World Social Forum: Free Palestine asking for world boycotts against Israel.
After all, Brazil and the West just love to be deceived — about Israel, gay supremacism and “the religion of peace.”
The truth behind the deception is: Marxists and Muslims hate Israel.
It will not be impossible for gay activists in the Palestinian public relations campaign to receive support from Brazilian and Western homosexuals. Some years ago, Brazilian gay activist Tony Goes said,
“I dare to ask a question: Was the creation of Israel a good idea? It is indisputable the success of the Israeli society, which in a short time turned what was a piece of desert into a democratic nation with a European standard of living (and beautiful men!). Yet, would not the world be a bit more peaceful without this permanent focus of strife in the Middle East?”
This is the dream of every Nazi and Muslim: a world without Israel.
Of course, gay activists also see Christianity as a permanent focus of strife, and they, with Nazis and Muslims, would welcome the idea that a world without Christianity would be more peaceful.
By the way, some years ago Tony Goes said, “What I like most is the look of Julio Severo: he wants to be Jesus Christ. Folks, let us make his dream into reality and crucify him!”
If, for the sake of world peace, he wants even the extinction of Israel, who I am to deserve his mercy?
But the fact has not changed: the land of Israel is the dream and promise of God to the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
Palestinians can use gays and other strategies, but no one can take away what God has promised.
Palestinians can have 50% of the Brazilian or American land, if Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff and Barack Obama agree, but be clearly advised: the Land of Israel has already an Owner and heirs, and any boycott against them is an act against Him.
With information from WikiIslam.
Portuguese version of this article: Gays palestinos querem boicotes mundiais contra Israel
Other article by Julio Severo:

Monday, November 19, 2012

America, Conservative Christians and Third World Expectations


America, Conservative Christians and Third World Expectations

By Julio Severo
Evangelicals are “fighting an uphill battle of demographics” on issues such as gay “marriage”, Focus on the Family President Jim Daly told the Los Angeles Times after the election.
Last month, he said evangelicals and social conservatives were “rowing against the tide” with their focus on traditional values issues such as abortion and gay “marriage” in their political messaging.
His call for “moderation” basically was a plea for Christians to stop their political opposition to such issues in light of Obama’s recent electoral victory.
His admonition implies that after decades, Democrats (referred to as socialists hereinafter) have achieved victory through a mass change of mind in the American people, who now want abortion and gay “marriage.” In part, this is true in regard to native-born Americans who became liberal after long-term exposure to mass indoctrination camps (aka public schools). Thanks to this indoctrination, they see, speak and dream socialism (aka Democratic Party).
And yet, there are not enough native-born liberal Americans to decide elections. In this point, enters the fantastic Democratic plan, and Ann Coulter explained it very well by saying that Democrats have profoundly changed the US demographics. She writes:
Most Americans don’t realize that, decades ago, the Democrats instituted a long-term plan to gradually turn the United States into a Third World nation. The country would become poorer and less free, but Democrats would have an unbeatable majority!
It should also be added that as a result of this plan, America is today a less Christian nation. A recent AP story said that “For the first time in its history, the United States does not have a Protestant majority.” Evidently, an aggressive and mindless liberalism in the mainline Protestant churches that is scaring members away has been fundamentally helpful to the socialist plan, but immigration is changing not only the ethnic face of America, but also her Christian demographics and influence.
Coulter says,
Under Teddy Kennedy’s 1965 immigration act, our immigration policy changed from one that replicated the existing ethnic population to one that strictly favored unskilled immigrants from the Third World. Since 1968, 85 percent of legal immigrants have come from what is euphemistically called “developing countries.”
America can’t admit computer scientists from Europe fleeing their failing socialist continent, and she definitely can’t admit Christians fleeing Islamic persecution even from Muslim nations invaded by her because she has to make room for Muslim immigrants. The socialist (Democratic) plan demands that the Christian demographics of America be changed. Christians out, Muslims in.
William J. Murray, chairman of Religious Freedom Coalition, told me recently, “Muslims are being moved into the Bible Belt as they come in. Nashville and Atlanta are the immigration hubs for Obama to dump Muslims into the US. On top of that Mexican cartels are moving Muslims that can’t get visas because of their associations in through the border.”
Coulter writes,
Because recent immigrants have no skills, they arrive in dire need of government assistance. Their desperation has been an enormous boon to the Democratic Party.
It’s not that poor immigrants think differently about most issues from conservatives. Try asking a recent immigrant:
How do you feel about abortion?
It’s taking a life.
What should we do about criminals?
Lock them up and throw away the key.
Do you support raising taxes?
No, the government takes too much already.
How do you feel about overpaid, well-pensioned government workers with no-show jobs?
It ticks me off.
Do you support gay marriage?
Absolutely not.
How are you going to vote?
Democratic.
Yes, because Democrats give gifts!
This is true, for example, of Latin American immigrants, the most faithful Democratic supporters. US Catholic bishops have been vocally pro-life, but over 70% Catholics, most Latin Americans, voted for Obama and Democrats.
Latin American immigrants most certainly oppose abortion and gay “marriage”. The problem is that poor, uneducated people — the Democratic base — like free stuff that socialists with a D give them.
Brazilian people are not different. They usually vote for the most generous givers. And they have replicated their behavior in America. A Brazilian friend living in America told me that most of her Brazilian friends in America supported Obama. They are evangelicals who oppose abortion and homosexuality. But they like the privileges and gifts offered by socialists. In short, they will sacrifice any important value to get privileges and gifts. America would lose nothing if she deported Brazilians and other immigrants that put their personal comfort above traditional family values.
So Jim Daly has fundamentally misunderstood the current American reality. A conservative candidate does not need to “tone down” his opposition to gay “marriage” and abortion. If all he wants is to please a multitude of voters, he should do what any Third World dictator does: to promise lots and lots of free stuff.
After all, considering that most of the immigrants to America come from Third World nations, they have Third World aspirations: they want government to feed them, help them, etc.
Yet, to insist on lots and lots of largesse is not the Christian way to do things. The Bible way is:
“We urge you, brothers, to do this more and more, and to aspire to live quietly, and to mind your own affairs, and to work with your hands, as we instructed you.” (1 Thessalonians 4:10-11 ESV)
Conservative Christians should never tone down their opposition to gay “marriage” and abortion for the sake of electoral gains.
If immigrants, Brazilians included, voted according to moral and Christian principles, Obama and the Democrats would never win. But this raises a serious issue: what is the alternative?
The candidates facing Obama did not mirror the moral or Christian values of immigrants. They actually “moderated” and “toned down” their opposition to gay “marriage,” abortion and other major moral issues, exactly as Jim Daly proposed. And it did not work.
As a Christian, I could never vote for Obama or the opposing candidates and their “moderate” stances, which are immoral too.
It is too late for conservative Christians to stop the massive immigration caused by Democrats. These immigrants, who oppose gay “marriage” and abortion, are deciding American elections merely by choosing the guy offering the most handouts.
If a candidate said “we have to work very hard to build our nation,” he would have been elected by Americans two or three hundred years ago, but not today.
Yet, if he said “if you choose me, you will receive a lot of gifts,” his election would be guaranteed today, but probably not two or three hundred years ago.
Socialists have been successfully changing American demographics unopposed since the 1960s. Perhaps Republicans or conservatives should fight fire with fire and bring conservative immigrants from other nations. In this case, socialists would do what they have never done before: fierce opposition to immigration policies!
But where would Republicans or conservatives get millions of conservative immigrants? Even many Christians in Brazil and other nations are tainted by socialist expectations: they want government to do everything for them.
There is little hope for American social conservatives and their political survival.
How should American conservative Christians respond to the Third World change in their nation?
If they cannot go to the ends of the earth to preach the Gospel, people from these ends are being brought by socialists (aka Democrats) to receive the Gospel — not the Social, Marxist and liberal Gospel that is destroying mainline Protestant churches in America, but the real Gospel, which delivers people from every evil, including socialism (aka Democratic Party).
At least, this is my view as a Brazilian Christian.
With information from the Washington Times and WND. Reviewed by Don Hank.
Recommended Reading:

Friday, November 16, 2012

Brazil to Host World’s Biggest Pro-Palestine Event


Brazil to Host World’s Biggest Pro-Palestine Event

By Julio Severo
The “World Social Forum - Free Palestine” meets in Porto Alegre, Brazil, from 28 November to 1st December 2012, in light of stormy changes known as “the Arab Spring,” where Muslim governments have been replaced by radical Islamic governments, with dire consequences for Christian populations in these nations.
The organizers of the massive pro-Palestine forum have thanked the Brazil government for hosting it, and they regard it “as a crucial and extraordinary landmark in a process that will widen support” for the Palestinian struggle to exercise what they consider a “Palestinian inalienable right: an independent state with Jerusalem as its capital”.

Support from Liberal Christians and Jews

WSF Free Palestine boasts that its event has the official support from “prominent theological figures and the World Council of Churches”.
Leonardo Boff, the most prominent liberation theology advocate in Brazil, has showed his support for the WSF Free Palestine. He said, “It is our duty to be on the side of the Palestinians.”
Nancy Cardoso, a Methodist minister from CEBI (Ecumenical Bible Center) in Rio Grande do Sul, said, “We see the WSF Free Palestine as a key space to give voice to our Palestinian brothers and sisters.”
Liberal religious authorities from Israel and other nations have confirmed their presence, including Jewish theologian professor Marc Ellis, an American author and liberation theologian activist.
Delegations from 36 countries from all five continents have already registered for the World Social Forum Free Palestine turning this event into the largest gathering of solidarity for the Palestine cause. Delegations from the following countries have confirmed their presence: South Africa, Germany, Argentine, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, Scotland, Spain, United States, Philippines, France, Ghana, Guinea, India, England, Iran, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Lebanon, Norway, Palestine, Pakistan, Paraguay, Democratic Republic of Congo, Senegal, Swaziland, Togo, Tunisia, Uruguay and Venezuela.

Radical Speakers

Among international speakers are:
Ronnie Kasrils (born 15 November 1938) is a South African politician. He was a member of the African National Congress (ANC) as well as a member of the Central Committee of the South African Communist Party (SACP). He is one of the most eloquent speakers against Israel and an advocate for a Palestinian state.
Angela Yvonne Davis (born January 26, 1944) is an Afro-American and prominent leader of the Communist Party USA. She was the director of the Feminist Studies department at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Her expertise is feminism, African American studies and Marxism. Her membership in the Communist Party led to Ronald Reagan’s request in 1969 to have her barred from teaching at any university in the State of California. She was one the suspects in the abduction and murder of Judge Harold Haley in 1970. She is the author of nine books and has lectured throughout the United States as well as in Europe, Africa, Asia, Australia, and South America.

Aims

In its event in Brazil, the “World Social Forum - Free Palestine” aims to:
1) Defending the right of the Palestinian people to fight Israel.
2) Strengthening and expanding involvement in the global, Palestinian-led campaign of boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) against Israel. This campaign, which encompasses boycotts of and divestments from Israeli and international companies, has already been embraced by US mainline Protestant denominations, including Presbyterian, Lutheran and Anglican.
3) Making the WSF Free Palestine a platform for building BDS strategies against Israel and in particular for ending free trade agreements between Israel and other countries or groups of countries (such as the European Union, Mercosur, etc.).
4) Recognizing and supporting the struggle of progressive Jews everywhere, particularly those who support the creation of a Palestinian state.
5) Supporting Palestinian resistance against Israel.
6) Launching effective public information campaigns to encourage the media in exposing and condemning Israel.

Strategic Location

The “World Social Forum - Free Palestine” chose Brazil for its massive event because of its politically strategic importance. Two years ago, former socialist Brazilian President Luiz Inácio “Lula” da Silva officially acknowledged Palestine as a national state. His successor, Dilma Rousseff, has kept his Palestinian advocacy.
The forum will happen in Porto Alegre, in the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul, where the ruling Workers’ Party has a stronghold. The Evangelical Church of the Lutheran Confession in Brazil, with its 700,000 members, has also a stronghold in this state.
This Brazilian Lutheran denomination has had a crucial role in the liberation theology advocacy and a former president, who is a prominent leader in the World Council of Churches, was implicated in Soviet schemes decades ago, according to an exposé by FrontPageMag.
Yet, more strategic is the region. Porto Alegre is near the Triple Frontier (Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay), where terrorist groups like Egypt’s al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, and Al Qaeda draw some of their funding.
Other articles by Julio Severo:

Wednesday, November 07, 2012

Brazilian Pentecostals: Church Growth Endangered by Socialist Embrace


Brazilian Pentecostals: Church Growth Endangered by Socialist Embrace

By Julio Severo
The Associated Press published a curious report on Brazil this week. The report said,
Pentecostalism was once seen as a major threat to Brazil’s Catholic Church. Pentecostal churches, many of them founded by U.S. evangelicals, saw their membership double to more than 12 percent of the country's population over the 1990s, with about half of the congregants estimated to be former Catholics.
During the 1990s, Brazil’s economy suffered from hyperinflation and other woes, and Pentecostal churches aggressively recruited in the slums and poor outskirts of Brazil’s cities by offering nuts-and-bolts self-improvement advice as well as Christian ministry.
Since 2003, however, Pentecostal churches have seen growth slow. The percentage of Brazilians calling themselves Pentecostals edged up from 12.5 percent of the population to 13.3 percent.
Fascinatingly, 2003 is the date when former President Luiz Inácio “Lula” da Silva began his pro-abortion and pro-sodomy administration.
In the past, Lula and his socialism were seen as “demonic” by Pentecostals. In their turn, Pentecostals were seen as “radicals” by Protestants.
Yet, by the efforts of a former Presbyterian superstar minister, who worked to make Lula and his ideology pleasant to evangelicals, Pentecostals began to do what some major Protestant (Presbyterian, Lutheran, Methodist, etc.) leaders had been doing for decades: to march at the Marxist tune.
Protestant churches in this march are basically stagnant, numerically and spiritually. Unsurprisingly, Pentecostal churches began to suffer a slow grow after deciding to march with Protestants.
In the 2002 presidential election, for the first time in the Protestant history in Brazil, 500 major traditional Protestant, Pentecostal and neo-Pentecostal leaders joined hands to elect Lula.
The former Presbyterian superstar? Since his progressive work in the 1990s to lead Pentecostals and neo-Pentecostals to follow Theology of Integral Mission (the Protestant variant of the Marxist Liberation Theology), he has been leading a disgraced life. His former glory collapsed after the financial and sexual scandals destroyed his marriage and ministry in the late 1990s.
Yet, his moral collapse happened too late to save at least Pentecostal and neo-Pentecostal churches from his progressive ideas embraced by Protestants. Pentecostals were mesmerized by his persuasive, progressive intellectual arguments, which brought ideological growth, but no spiritual growth. They forgot Apostle Paul’s words,
“My speech and my message were not in plausible words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power.” (1 Corinthians 2:4 ESV)
Enticed by the arguments of the Presbyterian superstar, many Pentecostals and neo-Pentecostals stopped seeing Lula, his party and socialism as “demonic”.
The consequences were just appalling. The socialist ideology and policies that Lula and his comrades injected in the Brazilian State have experienced extraordinary growth, while Pentecostals and neo-Pentecostals have seen slow growth.
Socialism: dead end for the church
Is there any compatibility between Christianity and socialism? Churches that adhere to it give up its growth to it.
The AP report was unable to recognize it, but 2003 is an unforgettable date in the Brazilian history. It was the year that Lula began to rule with his radical politically-correct agenda of homosexuality and abortion. It was the year that began the slow growth of Pentecostals.
Socialism is a religion. It requires you, your family, your pocket, your health, your children, their health, their education, your view, your dreams, etc.
Anytime any Christian group adheres to it, it gets weaker and socialism gets stronger.
Brazilian Pentecostals had plenty of opportunities to learn it from the tragic liberal experience of progressive Catholics and many of their Protestant brothers, especially the former Presbyterian superstar, but they did not want.
Now, they have no choice: they will learn it from their own sins.
Recommended Reading:

Tuesday, November 06, 2012

U.N. wants ‘homophobia’ criminalized


U.N. wants ‘homophobia’ criminalized

Lobbying for law that would make 'prejudices' criminalized

By WND
Homosexual advocates in Brazil have been joined by a coalition of United Nations groups in an effort to pressure the nation to criminalize “homophobia” under the guise that such “prejudices” are a hindrance to AIDS prevention programs.
According to a report from Julio Severo, who runs the Last Days Watchman, a new letter addressed to Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff and other officials explains that Brazil’s homosexual community has been plagued by AIDS rates of “more than 10 percent.”
That’s even though the AIDS “epidemic” sweeping the nation is affecting only 0.6 percent of the general population. The letter claims that the “main culprit of the high HIV prevalence among homosexuals is the high violence against them.”
The letter also says prejudices against homosexuality are a strong hindrance to AIDS prevention programs.
The recent letter came from the Expanded Thematic Group on HIV/AIDS in Brazil, in joint partnership with USAID, UNHCR, U.N. Women, UNAIDS, UNESCO, UNFPA and UNICEF and several other groups.
The signatories include the Brazilian Ministry of Health, the Human Rights Special Secretariat of the Brazilian Presidency and ABGLT, the largest homosexual group in Brazil, Severo reports.
The effort comes as pressure from socially progressive groups is ramping up in Brazil to promote and protect homosexuality, to the point of making those who hold opposing viewpoints subject to criminal prosecution.
A recent study tested the Brazilian population for “homophobia” by asking people to comment on such statements as “God made men and women with different sexes so that they could fulfill their role and have children,” Severo reported.
He said the 92 percent of Brazilians who agreed partially or completely with the statement were labeled “homophobic.”
“Based on the overall results of the study, the Brazilian government determined that 99 percent of its citizens were ‘homophobic’ and therefore should be reeducated,” he explained.
“Apparently failing to achieve a mass reeducation of its people, the Rousseff administration now receives international support to advance its stalled anti-’homophobia’ bills and measures.”
Severo said the letter explains that the criminalization of “homophobia” is “fundamental for the success of AIDS prevention programs.”
He reported: “The letter gives an example of the high violence against gays, by quoting a figure of 278 homosexuals murdered in 2011 in Brazil. The figure, produced by the Bahia Gay Group (Grupo Gay da Bahia), is a stark contrast with about 50,000 Brazilians murdered each year. Brazilian socialist anti-gun policies have made its population prey to criminals and murderers. Homosexuals, who often live in drug and prostitution-plagued areas, are not more vulnerable than the general population.”
Severo also noted the information is suspect, since it is sourced to Bahia Gay Group. He said the group was founded by Luiz Mott, “whose defense of pedophilia is public.
Severo said the letter stresses that the Brazilian state should have no connection to religion.
“The Brazilian government has no official and non-official religions, but the U.N. agencies behind the letter were obviously eying the Christian feelings of the most Brazilians,” he said. “Because of these feelings and heritage, Brazilians reject any kind of homosexual indoctrination in schools and the imposition of the gay ideology on their society.”
He said the letter pushes for the adoption of measures to battle “homophobia,” including plans such as a proposed PLC122, a law to make “homophobic” views “crimes.”
Critics contend the bill’s approval would censor religious leaders and group members who would mention anti-sodomy Bible verses – even within church buildings.
Severo said, “Certainly, the Rousseff administration welcomes the international pressure to do exactly what it has wanted to do for a long time: to impose the gay agenda on the most of the Brazilians that insist on seeing homosexuality as an abnormality.”
Severo’s advocacy for the family in Brazil has drawn major opposition. WND reported when PayPal responded to an online campaign by homosexuals demanding he be denied the use of the PayPal system and launching an “investigation.”
PayPal executives dispatched an email explaining that because of “legal and regulatory constraints,” the company was “unable to process donation payments for non-registered charities and non-profit organizations; political party/organizations; religious institutions; personal/organizational fundraisers, etc.”
PayPal’s move cut off significant levels of financial support for Severo, who relies on friends and others to continue the work of his ministry.
“PayPal says that it does not allow the use of its service for activities that promote hatred, violence or racial intolerance, but its action against my account was spurred by a hate campaign by gay activists wanting to shut down my account,” Severo told WND at the time. “I am very worried, because PayPal caved in to gay militants and their hate campaign to have me excluded from PayPal.”
PayPal declined to comment, but others weren’t hesitant to express their opinion. Don Hank, who runs the Laigle’s Forum website, said: “This is war. … PayPal is now official the enemy of traditional Christianity.”
Source: WND, via Last Days Watchman
Recommended Reading: